User Tools

Site Tools


minixperformance

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

minixperformance [2014/11/11 08:52] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +This page is to collect observations and experiments related to performance of minix.
 +
 +====== Starting point ======
 +
 +There are countless ways to talk about performance,​ so let's start with one simple case that is both relevant for our daily usage and displays terrible performance:​ gcc and clang on minix.
 +
 +====== Basic Observations ======
 +
 +  * Clang is significantly slower than gcc on minix, and it's supposed to be faster.
 +  * There is high idle time when gcc and clang are executing, suggesting high i/o wait time
 +
 +====== Experiments ======
 +
 +(Timing measurements to be done.)
 +
 +  * Run with huge primary cache: no more idle time. clang is still significantly slower than gcc though, and gcc still isn't very fast.
 +  * Run with /usr/tmp, /tmp and /usr/src on ramdisks: almost no idle time any more.
 +  * Marking unreferenced blocks as clean if they'​re dirty: happens but doesn'​t help much in real time.
 +  * Defer evicting dirty blocks from the cache, prefering a clean block even if it's older in order to batch write operations: helps with reducing flushall() calls but not much in real time.
  
minixperformance.txt · Last modified: 2014/11/11 08:52 (external edit)