wishlist:david
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
wishlist:david [2017/03/16 14:29] dcvmoole update |
wishlist:david [2017/10/11 18:13] (current) dcvmoole networking project is merged |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
| * problem: it is currently possible to mess up the MIB tree with bad name+id combos in RMIB mount requests | * problem: it is currently possible to mess up the MIB tree with bad name+id combos in RMIB mount requests | ||
| - | === Move the BSD socket API into VFS === | + | === Disallow killing processes in an uninterruptible system call === |
| - | * status: **PULL REQUEST FILED** | + | * reason: processes may currently be terminated while in an uninterruptible system call, possibly triggering poorly-tested scenarios in other services (safecopy failures, etc) |
| - | * reason: libc should not need to test or track socket types, it violates the light-libc minix philosophy | + | * complication: this will require changes to the PM signal state machine, with subtle side effects |
| - | * reason: the individual writes to implement sendto (etc) probably violate posix signal atomicity | + | * complication: involving all user-facing system services in exit notification is a performance problem |
| - | * benefit: this allows for proper socket call support in trace(1) | + | * note: the most obvious solution would be kernel support for notification (to PM) when a process system call has completed, comparable to SIGNDELAY, and a PREEXIT process state in PM |
| - | * complication: this will break everything, require INET's retirement and a substantial UDS rewrite | + | * note: ideally the same idea would be applied to signal handler invocation, because the current approach makes dangerous and already-incorrect(?) assumptions about "retreg" there |
| - | * note: this is probably best done along with many other network stack related changes | + | |
| + | === Add support for pselect(2) === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * reason: pselect(2) is required by dhcpcd(8) and various other parts of userland | ||
| + | * complication: pselect(2) is supposed to be atomic and thus cannot be implemented as a select(2) wrapper | ||
| + | * complication: a proper implementation will require a non-trivial extension to the PM/VFS protocol | ||
| + | * subsequent project: also implement paccept(2); this will require storing more call state in VFS | ||
| === Implement job control === | === Implement job control === | ||
| Line 215: | Line 221: | ||
| * complication: different file system will require different small exceptions | * complication: different file system will require different small exceptions | ||
| * complication: no neat way to model orphan management in the edge (directory) layer | * complication: no neat way to model orphan management in the edge (directory) layer | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Move the BSD socket API into VFS === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * status: **MERGED** | ||
| + | * reason: libc should not need to test or track socket types, it violates the light-libc minix philosophy | ||
| + | * reason: the individual writes to implement sendto (etc) probably violate posix signal atomicity | ||
| + | * benefit: this allows for proper socket call support in trace(1) | ||
| + | * complication: this will break everything, require INET's retirement and a substantial UDS rewrite | ||
| + | * note: this is probably best done along with many other network stack related changes | ||
| === Look into setuid/seteuid behavior === | === Look into setuid/seteuid behavior === | ||
wishlist/david.1489670941.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/03/16 14:29 by dcvmoole
